8 at Princeton Assail 'False' Portrayal of Prof as Racist

Stuart Taylor, Jr October 27, 2021 1 min read

Stuart Taylor, Jr
RealClearPolitics

Princeton University’s diversity, equity, and inclusion bureaucracy, which receives complaints from faculty and students about alleged discrimination and harassment, itself now stands accused by eight Princeton professors of harassing a ninth by falsely and dishonestly portraying him as a racist.

The eight professors’ previously unreported complaint and attached letter includes an accusation that someone (or more than one person) in the diversity-equity-inclusion bureaucracy deliberately falsified on the university’s official website a much-discussed passage in a July 2020 Quillette article by classics Professor Joshua Katz in order to reinforce the website’s portrayal of him as a racist.

Click here for link to full article

Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.


Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

FIRE Spotlight on Speech Codes 2026: Good News, but Not for Princeton
FIRE Spotlight on Speech Codes 2026: Good News, but Not for Princeton

Leslie Spencer August 20, 2026 2 min read

The good news is that the percentage of colleges and universities earning FIRE's "red light" (bad) rating has reached a low of 13 percent — a 55 percent drop since the "Spotlight" report began in 2006, and a 1.5 percent drop from last year. The bad news is that Princeton is among that 13 percent. Princeton is still found to maintain policies that "clearly and substantially" restrict free expression.

Read More
Free Speech in the Classroom
Free Speech in the Classroom

Robert P. George August 19, 2026 1 min read

With the new academic year approaching, I encourage professors who teach on controversial matters to include on their syllabi a statement like the one I include on mine:

“As set forth in Rights, Rules, Responsibilities section 1.1.3, Princeton University strictly respects the right to free speech of everyone in our community of scholars and learners. That right is sacrosanct in this class and is possessed by faculty and students alike. With the aim of advancing and deepening everyone’s understanding of the issues addressed in the course, students are urged to speak their minds, explore ideas and arguments, play devil’s advocate, and engage in civil but robust discussions. There is no thought or language policing. We expect students to do business in the proper currency of intellectual discourse—a currency consisting of reasons, evidence, and arguments—but no ideas or positions are out of bounds.”

Read More
Princeton Anthropologist's Response to Humanities Report Raises Academic Freedom Concerns
Princeton Anthropologist's Response to Humanities Report Raises Academic Freedom Concerns

Tal Fortgang  August 18, 2026 6 min read

Read More