Letter to The Editor Which Daily Princetonian Has Ignored

February 17, 2021 2 min read

Letter to the Editor of Daily Princetonian Referred to in Feb 17, 2021, Editorial

Professor Elizabeth Bogan, a much-admired senior lecturer who retired last year after teaching economics from 1992 to 2020, submitted the following letter to the editor to the Daily Princetonian on February 7. She told PFS on February 13 that it had not been published or even acknowledged. Meanwhile, the paper has continued to attack Professor Katz.

The full, until now unpublished, Feb 7 Elizabeth Bogan letter to the editor of the Daily Princetonian is as follows:

 
As a member of Princeton's Faculty for almost 30 years, I have long admired the Daily Princetonian and cherished the many staff members who took my economics courses.

But Thursday the paper reached a low point of journalism I never expected at Princeton. Your attack of Professor Joshua Katz is nothing but an unprecedented hit job.

The strongest accusation is about an alleged relationship with a woman who would neither give her name nor say anything critical about Professor Katz.

The best you could find of a first-hand complaint is that Professor Katz took a student to dinner once. If she didn’t want to have dinner with him, was she too weak to decline the offer? Faculty having dinner with students is one of the finest of Princeton traditions. I have had dinner with hundreds of students in the dorms, in the clubs, and yes often at Mediterra. (And I always paid the bill.) I have wonderful memories from discussions outside of classes with thousands of students. I hope your vicious attack on Professor Katz doesn't stop the wonderful student/faculty closeness I experienced at Princeton and still do with emails from alumni.

Professor Katz is a brilliant classics scholar who loves to get people excited about his field. He has won the highest teaching awards at Princeton. But because he doesn’t share the Prince’s opinion on how to achieve a just society you attack him. You don't even seem to care about all the work he has quietly done behind the scenes to promote minority students. I thought Universities were established for open debate, not attempted character assassination. 
 
You owe Professor Katz and all independent thinkers an apology.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Bogan, Department of Economics, 1992-June 2020


Leave a comment


Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

Should Universities Engage in Politics? A Roundtable Discussion on Academic Freedom and Institutional Neutrality

March 13, 2025 1 min read

April 2, 2025 Roundtable
Should Universities Engage in Politics? A Roundtable Discussion on Academic Freedom and Institutional Neutrality
Anton Ford, Randall Kennedy, and Keith Whittington 
Princeton Council on Academic Freedom 

Excerpt: Please join us for a wide-ranging conversation about the philosophical and political stakes of academic neutrality, academic activism, and academic freedom - and the ways in which they intersect. Numerous peer institutions have recently adopted neutrality policies, which prohibit universities from adopting positions on political and social matters not directly tied to the mission of the university. Yet the merits of neutrality, as well as its feasibility, remain highly contested.

This event brings together three leading scholars who hold a range of differing positions on these questions in order to discuss whether, when, and how universities should take institutional stances on social and political issues, and the implications of such stances for academic freedom.

Read More
Campus groups react after Resources Committee rejects dissociation proposal

March 07, 2025 1 min read

Elisabeth Stewart and Luke Grippo
Daily Princetonian 

Excerpt: The Resources Committee of the Council of the Princeton University Community (CPUC) announced on Wednesday that a proposal for the University to cut financial ties with entities implicated in “Israel’s illegal occupations, apartheid practices, and plausible acts of genocide” will not move forward, citing a lack of campus consensus.

Student advocates across campus reacted to the decision with frustration, disappointment, and support. But one sentiment they did not express was consensus — about the issue, about the Committee’s decision, or even about the process behind it.

Read More
Commentary: Why the Resources Committee is not recommending dissociation from Israel

March 06, 2025 1 min read 1 Comment

John T. Groves
Daily Princetonian 

Excerpt: Nine months ago in The Daily Princetonian, I described how the Resources Committee of the Council of the Princeton University Community, which I chair, would take up a divestment and dissociation request related to the State of Israel.

I outlined our approach, promising it would include careful consideration of input from the broad University community, and cautioning that it might be a lengthy process. That process has concluded, and the Committee has decided against forwarding a dissociation recommendation to the Board of Trustees.

Read More