Menu
0
    0

    Your Cart is Empty

    2025 Student Free Speech Survey

    Read our Analysis of the 2025 Free Speech Campus Climate Survey Results

    Home / Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary
    Previous  / Next

    Letter to The Editor Which Daily Princetonian Has Ignored

    Letter to the Editor of Daily Princetonian Referred to in Feb 17, 2021, Editorial Professor Elizabeth Bogan, a much-admired senior lecturer who retired last year after teaching economics from 1992 to 2020, submitted the following letter to the editor to the Daily Princetonian on February 7. She told PFS on February 13 that it had not been published or even acknowledged. Meanwhile, the paper has continued to attack Professor Katz. February 17, 2021 2 min read

    Academic Freedom Academic Freedom at Princeton Free Speech at Princeton University Institutional Governance & Accountability Viewpoint Diversity Viewpoint Diversity at Princeton

    Letter to the Editor of Daily Princetonian Referred to in Feb 17, 2021, Editorial

    Professor Elizabeth Bogan, a much-admired senior lecturer who retired last year after teaching economics from 1992 to 2020, submitted the following letter to the editor to the Daily Princetonian on February 7. She told PFS on February 13 that it had not been published or even acknowledged. Meanwhile, the paper has continued to attack Professor Katz.

    The full, until now unpublished, Feb 7 Elizabeth Bogan letter to the editor of the Daily Princetonian is as follows:

     
    As a member of Princeton's Faculty for almost 30 years, I have long admired the Daily Princetonian and cherished the many staff members who took my economics courses.

    But Thursday the paper reached a low point of journalism I never expected at Princeton. Your attack of Professor Joshua Katz is nothing but an unprecedented hit job.

    The strongest accusation is about an alleged relationship with a woman who would neither give her name nor say anything critical about Professor Katz.

    The best you could find of a first-hand complaint is that Professor Katz took a student to dinner once. If she didn’t want to have dinner with him, was she too weak to decline the offer? Faculty having dinner with students is one of the finest of Princeton traditions. I have had dinner with hundreds of students in the dorms, in the clubs, and yes often at Mediterra. (And I always paid the bill.) I have wonderful memories from discussions outside of classes with thousands of students. I hope your vicious attack on Professor Katz doesn't stop the wonderful student/faculty closeness I experienced at Princeton and still do with emails from alumni.

    Professor Katz is a brilliant classics scholar who loves to get people excited about his field. He has won the highest teaching awards at Princeton. But because he doesn’t share the Prince’s opinion on how to achieve a just society you attack him. You don't even seem to care about all the work he has quietly done behind the scenes to promote minority students. I thought Universities were established for open debate, not attempted character assassination. 
     
    You owe Professor Katz and all independent thinkers an apology.

    Sincerely,

    Elizabeth Bogan, Department of Economics, 1992-June 2020


    Leave a comment

    Comments will be approved before showing up.

    Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

    Muscle Atrophy: A Chinese International Student’s Reflection on Self-Censorship
    Muscle Atrophy: A Chinese International Student’s Reflection on Self-Censorship

    Elaine Gao September 22, 2026 4 min read

    Alumni & Student Advocacy Free Speech at Princeton University PFS Original Content Supporting Students Free Expression

    Free speech is usually described as a right one either has or does not have, relative to the laws of one’s residence. But a right, like a muscle, is only as strong as its use. When my family flew to the United States in 2018, I naively thought that I had escaped the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) systematic suppression of free speech. I believed that I would access Google, YouTube, and Winnie the Pooh without any need for a VPN to circumvent the “Great Firewall of China,” a term used to describe the CCP’s firm control on online content. But I was clueless: I unknowingly carried a part of the repression within me. 

    Read More
    Why is Princeton so afraid of chalk?
    Why is Princeton so afraid of chalk?

    Isaac Barsoum  September 17, 2026 1 min read

    Campus Protests and Free Expression Free Speech at Princeton University Princeton Free Speech Rules Rules & Policies Supporting Students Free Expression

    In April 1995, University maintenance crews spent two days cleaning “walkways, benches, plazas and walls on campus,” working to remove not dirt or debris, but simple sidewalk chalk. The chalk drawings, according to a report from The Daily Princetonian, consisted of “pro-gay messages” written by hand during Pride Week. After the removal, advocates were rightly in uproar. Following the incident, the University, claiming that the discrepancy had transpired because of “cross-office confusion,” clarified its chalking policy — it was henceforth banned, in all cases.

    Three decades on, chalk at Princeton has found itself relegated to dusty trays in classrooms and lecture halls. Hardly anyone — students, activists, artists, campus organizations, candidates, schoolchildren — chalks University grounds anymore. Simply put, the University’s ban has worked. But the question remains: Why is Princeton so afraid of chalk?

    Read More
    The real crisis on campus isn’t cheating, it’s thinking
    The real crisis on campus isn’t cheating, it’s thinking

    Jack Goodman  September 15, 2026 1 min read

    Academic Freedom Institutional Governance & Accountability Rules & Policies

    There is exactly one kind of institution in the world whose product is “thinking” — the university. This is an existential challenge for every university, Princeton most definitely included, now that nearly all artificial intelligence is purpose-built to offload the hard work of thinking.

    Universities need to return to the foundations of learning with trust — and verification — at the heart of their relationship with students. They also need to be far more prescriptive about what learning looks like so that students who arrive with limited capacity for deep reading have the time and space to develop their critical thinking skills.

    Read More

    Recent Articles

    Categories