Letter to The Editor Which Daily Princetonian Has Ignored

February 17, 2021 2 min read

Letter to the Editor of Daily Princetonian Referred to in Feb 17, 2021, Editorial

Professor Elizabeth Bogan, a much-admired senior lecturer who retired last year after teaching economics from 1992 to 2020, submitted the following letter to the editor to the Daily Princetonian on February 7. She told PFS on February 13 that it had not been published or even acknowledged. Meanwhile, the paper has continued to attack Professor Katz.

The full, until now unpublished, Feb 7 Elizabeth Bogan letter to the editor of the Daily Princetonian is as follows:

 
As a member of Princeton's Faculty for almost 30 years, I have long admired the Daily Princetonian and cherished the many staff members who took my economics courses.

But Thursday the paper reached a low point of journalism I never expected at Princeton. Your attack of Professor Joshua Katz is nothing but an unprecedented hit job.

The strongest accusation is about an alleged relationship with a woman who would neither give her name nor say anything critical about Professor Katz.

The best you could find of a first-hand complaint is that Professor Katz took a student to dinner once. If she didn’t want to have dinner with him, was she too weak to decline the offer? Faculty having dinner with students is one of the finest of Princeton traditions. I have had dinner with hundreds of students in the dorms, in the clubs, and yes often at Mediterra. (And I always paid the bill.) I have wonderful memories from discussions outside of classes with thousands of students. I hope your vicious attack on Professor Katz doesn't stop the wonderful student/faculty closeness I experienced at Princeton and still do with emails from alumni.

Professor Katz is a brilliant classics scholar who loves to get people excited about his field. He has won the highest teaching awards at Princeton. But because he doesn’t share the Prince’s opinion on how to achieve a just society you attack him. You don't even seem to care about all the work he has quietly done behind the scenes to promote minority students. I thought Universities were established for open debate, not attempted character assassination. 
 
You owe Professor Katz and all independent thinkers an apology.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Bogan, Department of Economics, 1992-June 2020


Leave a comment


Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

Commentary: ‘How to Prosecute Genocide?’ panel hosted by Lichtenstein Institute for Self-Determination

November 21, 2024 1 min read

Leela Hensler
Daily Princetonian

Excerpt: On Tuesday, Nov. 19, Princeton students and faculty filled the lower level of McCosh 50 to hear Professor Luis Moreno Ocampo, who is the first chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), and Anoush Baghdassarian, who currently serves as a clerk on the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals, discuss the ICC’s role in securing justice for victims of genocide on a global scale. This scope includes conflicts which have been the focus of student activism, such as wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
Read More
Commentary: We must dispel the myth of Princeton’s economic diversity

November 21, 2024 1 min read

Raf Basas
Daily Princetonian

Excerpt: At Princeton, we often forget the sharp difference in income distributions between Princeton and the nation as a whole. The media spins a tale of great improvement: Though Princeton had once predominantly served America’s economic elite, it has done well in shedding the specter of affluence that has haunted it for centuries. After all, a whopping 65 percent of Princeton students receive some level of financial aid.

This is a persuasive narrative, but make no mistake: Princeton’s “economic diversity” is a myth. Although the numbers have improved since the 2017 article from The New York Times, just 30.8 percent of Princeton’s Class of 2026 is from the bottom 60 percent of U.S. households.
Read More
Commentary: Princeton’s liberal hypocrisy will only exacerbate the post-election political divide

November 21, 2024 1 min read

Siyeon Lee and Genevieve Shutt
Daily Princetonian

Excerpt: A coalition of Princeton’s liberal and progressive organizations hosted a ‘Walkout For Our Futures’ last Friday, in response to Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election. Like many others, we were fearful, dejected, and most of all, angry — and understandably, sought to make this sentiment known. This anger, however, was expressed by some protestors in a manner that was not only unproductive but also incendiary.

What democratic, egalitarian, or progressive purpose is served by ascribing idiocy to all of Trump’s administration — or by fantasizing about its failure? When progressives reduce Trump and his administration to incendiary insults, often attacking their intelligence and capability, his largely working-class, non-college-educated followers likely translate those insults as their own.
Read More