Menu
0
    0

    Your Cart is Empty

    Read Our Annual Report

    A comprehensive summary of the past year and future of PFS

    Read Here

    Home / Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary
    Previous  / Next

    PAW BOARD MUST KEEP ITS EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE

    July 24, 2021 2 min read

    In the July edition of the Princeton Alumni Weekly, known to alumni as PAW, the Chair of PAW’s Board, Marc Fisher, discusses in a letter to readers the efforts of Princeton to bring PAW under greater control of the University. While there may be legitimate reasons for some of the changes proposed by the University, it is very disturbing that the University at this point has not agreed to guarantee the continuing editorial independence of PAW.

    As we stated in a letter published in PAW’s “In Box,” we believe all alumni should support Mr. Fisher’s efforts to maintain independent editorial control. We strongly agree with his statement that “PAW maintains and strengthens alumni engagement with Princeton through respectful and open discussion of University events and policies – an especially vital role in this time of national and campus debate about the nature of free speech.”

    In recent months, we have seen the beginnings of a movement among alumni of universities to organize to promote free speech and academic freedom on their campuses, as Princetonians for Free Speech is doing for Princeton. As we discuss issues and concerns with these other alumni groups, one troubling trend is that universities are slowly moving to limit the independence of alumni groups and to bring the administration of such groups under the control of the university. Mr. Fisher’s letter to alumni alludes to this trend in discussing what other universities have done recently to limit the independent role of alumni publications.

    Alumni should, and now must more than ever, have a strong voice in determining the direction of universities, especially private ones. Universities should not become solely captives of administrators and faculty, but that is the trend. A great university like Princeton should be more than that. An independent PAW is critical to allow other voices to be heard. It should stay “a magazine by alumni for alumni.” If the administration moves to kill PAW’s independent editorial control, it will send a signal to all Princeton alumni that your voices do not really count any more.

    Edward L. Yingling, ’70 and Stuart Taylor, Jr. ’70, on behalf of Princetonians for Free Speech

    Leave a comment

    Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

    Commentary: ‘How to Prosecute Genocide?’ panel hosted by Lichtenstein Institute for Self-Determination

    November 21, 2024 1 min read

    Leela Hensler
    Daily Princetonian

    Excerpt: On Tuesday, Nov. 19, Princeton students and faculty filled the lower level of McCosh 50 to hear Professor Luis Moreno Ocampo, who is the first chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), and Anoush Baghdassarian, who currently serves as a clerk on the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals, discuss the ICC’s role in securing justice for victims of genocide on a global scale. This scope includes conflicts which have been the focus of student activism, such as wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
    Read More
    Commentary: We must dispel the myth of Princeton’s economic diversity

    November 21, 2024 1 min read

    Raf Basas
    Daily Princetonian

    Excerpt: At Princeton, we often forget the sharp difference in income distributions between Princeton and the nation as a whole. The media spins a tale of great improvement: Though Princeton had once predominantly served America’s economic elite, it has done well in shedding the specter of affluence that has haunted it for centuries. After all, a whopping 65 percent of Princeton students receive some level of financial aid.

    This is a persuasive narrative, but make no mistake: Princeton’s “economic diversity” is a myth. Although the numbers have improved since the 2017 article from The New York Times, just 30.8 percent of Princeton’s Class of 2026 is from the bottom 60 percent of U.S. households.
    Read More
    Commentary: Princeton’s liberal hypocrisy will only exacerbate the post-election political divide

    November 21, 2024 1 min read

    Siyeon Lee and Genevieve Shutt
    Daily Princetonian

    Excerpt: A coalition of Princeton’s liberal and progressive organizations hosted a ‘Walkout For Our Futures’ last Friday, in response to Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election. Like many others, we were fearful, dejected, and most of all, angry — and understandably, sought to make this sentiment known. This anger, however, was expressed by some protestors in a manner that was not only unproductive but also incendiary.

    What democratic, egalitarian, or progressive purpose is served by ascribing idiocy to all of Trump’s administration — or by fantasizing about its failure? When progressives reduce Trump and his administration to incendiary insults, often attacking their intelligence and capability, his largely working-class, non-college-educated followers likely translate those insults as their own.
    Read More

    Recent Articles

    Categories