PAW BOARD MUST KEEP ITS EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE

July 24, 2021 2 min read

In the July edition of the Princeton Alumni Weekly, known to alumni as PAW, the Chair of PAW’s Board, Marc Fisher, discusses in a letter to readers the efforts of Princeton to bring PAW under greater control of the University. While there may be legitimate reasons for some of the changes proposed by the University, it is very disturbing that the University at this point has not agreed to guarantee the continuing editorial independence of PAW.

As we stated in a letter published in PAW’s “In Box,” we believe all alumni should support Mr. Fisher’s efforts to maintain independent editorial control. We strongly agree with his statement that “PAW maintains and strengthens alumni engagement with Princeton through respectful and open discussion of University events and policies – an especially vital role in this time of national and campus debate about the nature of free speech.”

In recent months, we have seen the beginnings of a movement among alumni of universities to organize to promote free speech and academic freedom on their campuses, as Princetonians for Free Speech is doing for Princeton. As we discuss issues and concerns with these other alumni groups, one troubling trend is that universities are slowly moving to limit the independence of alumni groups and to bring the administration of such groups under the control of the university. Mr. Fisher’s letter to alumni alludes to this trend in discussing what other universities have done recently to limit the independent role of alumni publications.

Alumni should, and now must more than ever, have a strong voice in determining the direction of universities, especially private ones. Universities should not become solely captives of administrators and faculty, but that is the trend. A great university like Princeton should be more than that. An independent PAW is critical to allow other voices to be heard. It should stay “a magazine by alumni for alumni.” If the administration moves to kill PAW’s independent editorial control, it will send a signal to all Princeton alumni that your voices do not really count any more.

Edward L. Yingling, ’70 and Stuart Taylor, Jr. ’70, on behalf of Princetonians for Free Speech

Leave a comment


Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson reflects on path to the Supreme Court in campus lecture

September 11, 2025 1 min read

Isaac Bernstein and Justus Wilhoit 
Daily Princetonian 

Excerpt: Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Ketanji Brown Jackson sat down for an hour-long conversation with Professor Deborah Pearlstein in front of a full house at Richardson Auditorium on Wednesday. Nominated to the Supreme Court in 2022, she discussed her historic path to the nation’s highest court, the challenges of public life, and the lessons that have guided her career.

Read More
A Letter to the Class of ’29 from Princetonians for Free Speech

September 09, 2025 1 min read

Princetonians for Free Speech

Excerpt: Dear Princeton Class of ’29:

This letter comes to you from the alumni organization, Princetonians for Free Speech (PFS). We have existed since you started high school four years ago. We were founded in response to a growing concern that Princeton has drifted from its core mission of the pursuit of knowledge and truth, and towards a narrow activism that threatens free speech, academic freedom, and viewpoint diversity.

Read More
Commentary: Christopher Eisgruber’s Moronic Inferno

September 08, 2025 1 min read

Paul Du Quenoy 
Tablet Magazine

Excerpt: Endlessly self-congratulatory, insufferably pedantic, irritatingly repetitive, and self-referential nearly to the point of parody, Eisgruber argues that our system of higher education is, with rare and regrettable exceptions, successfully fulfilling its primary functions. In his opinion, his industry deserves “high marks” for protecting free speech rather than criticism for devaluing it. Academia’s travails indicate that our campuses are merely hapless victims of a larger “civic crisis” besetting American society, not a cause of it.

Endowed with a strong tradition of free expression, in Eisgruber’s strikingly ahistorical view, America has only recently succumbed to political divisions exacerbated by rampant partisanship and pernicious social media use. 

Read More