Your Cart is Empty
October 31, 2024
To Princetonians for Free Speech Subscribers, Members and Friends,
PFS hosted two events this month, one in Santa Barbara, California, and the other on campus. See details in the Special Feature below.
Additionally, our next PFS Inner Circle event is coming up. On November 21 at 4 pm EST Abigail Anthony '23, journalist and graduate students at Oxford University, will discuss free speech in journalism, her experience as a student activist, and more. You can event this event and all of our Inner Circle events by joining the Inner Circle subscription.
Two important PFS events took place this month, one was on campus, the other was in Santa Barbara, California, at our first regional alumni event.
In Princeton news, the following controversy tops the list. You may remember our coverage last spring ofThe Princeton Council on Academic Freedom:A New Faculty Group Brings a Common Sense Approach to Academic Freedom.
This new statement by a group of the Council’s members aims to prevent faculty-wide political statements: Using faculty meetings to declare political positions undermines Princeton’s mission
By Flora Champy, Stephen Macedo, Leora Batnitzky, Jonathan Mummolo, Sanjeev Kulkarni, Eve Krakowski, and Emmanuel Bourbouhakis, The Daily Princetonian, October 10, 2024
In a closed October 21 faculty meeting, an opposing faculty group came out against faculty neutrality, presumably because they are in favor of the Faculty Senate taking official positions on controversial issues of the day, and against the Council’s proposal: At closed meeting, faculty postpone vote on controversial proposals to April
By Olivia Sanches, the Daily Princetonian, October 22, 2024
Read the opposing group’s full statement on X. Among the 15 signatories is Dan-El Padilla Peralta, one of the faculty members who broke into Clio Hall last spring, along with students in protest against the war in Gaza. Some students still face criminal charges, Padilla does not.
In national news, the top of the list this month is a 9,000 word article:
The University of Michigan Doubled Down on D.E.I. What Went Wrong?
A decade and a quarter of a billion dollars later, students and faculty are more frustrated than ever.
By Nicholas Confessore, New York Times, October 16, 2024
Here we excerpt the New York Times’ summary: What to Know About the University of Michigan’s D.E.I. Experiment
A decade ago, the University of Michigan intentionally placed itself in the vanguard of a revolution then beginning to reshape American higher education. Around the country, college administrators were rapidly expanding D.E.I. programs. They believed that vigorous D.E.I. efforts would allow traditionally underrepresented students to thrive on campus -- and improve learning for students from all backgrounds….
In recent years, as D.E.I. programs came under withering attack, Michigan has only doubled down on D.E.I., holding itself out as a model for other schools. By one estimate, the university has built the largest D.E.I. bureaucracy of any big public university.
But an examination by The Times found that Michigan’s expansive -- and expensive -- D.E.I. program has struggled to achieve its central goals even as it set off a cascade of unintended consequences....
Instead of improving students’ ability to engage with one another across their differences, Michigan’s D.E.I. expansion has coincided with an explosion in campus conflict over race and gender. Everyday campus complaints and academic disagreements are now cast as crises of inclusion and harm.
University of Michigan Spent $250 Million on DEI, Made Students Unhappier
Michigan’s D.E.I. expansion has coincided with an explosion in campus conflict over race and gender,” notes The New York Times.
By Robby Soave, Reason Magazine, October 16, 2024
Professors in Trouble Over Protests Wonder if Academic Freedom Is Dying
Universities have cracked down on professors for pro-Palestinian activism, saying they are protecting students and tamping down on hate speech. Faculty members say punishments have put a “chill in the air.”
By Anemona Hartocollis, The New York Times, October 23, 2024
Another Harvard Crackdown on Free Speech
By Andrew Manuel Crespo and Reshmaan Hussam, Chronicle of Higher Education, October 22, 2024
The freedom of each Princeton faculty member to speak candidly on all manner of issues is indispensable. If faculty cannot express a broad range of intellectual views, including controversial ones, then the University’s mission to further human knowledge and educate students to become discerning, thoughtful citizens cannot be fully realized. …
… [W]e believe every member of Princeton’s faculty should be free to express political opinions, both in their official capacity and in their private speech. Likewise, if a group of faculty members — or other members of our community — seeks to collectively express a shared opinion, we support their right to do so. …
However, we object to efforts by any subset of the faculty to speak for all of us. We must all have the freedom to speak for ourselves. …
While faculty may entrust a small number of colleagues to vote on routine academic matters, they should not be authorized to make moral or political pronouncements on behalf of the entire faculty. We oppose faculty meetings being used as a political arena where colleagues must either engage in potentially rancorous opposition or risk a false sense of consensus on otherwise controversial questions. …
Let us reserve faculty meetings for their intended purpose: governing the University. By doing so, we will further our core mission — the pursuit and dissemination of knowledge — by protecting the right of every member of Princeton’s campus to speak for themselves.
Leora Batnitzky, The Ronald O. Perelman Professor of Jewish Studies and Professor of Religion
Emmanuel Bourbouhakis, Associate Professor of Classics & Hellenic Studies
Flora Champy, Associate Professor of French in the Department of French and Italian.
Eve Krakowski, Associate Professor of Near Eastern Studies & Judaic Studies
Sanjeev Kulkarni, William R. Kenan, Jr., Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Operations Research and Financial Engineering
Stephen Macedo, Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Center for Human Values
Jonathan Mummolo, Associate Professor of Politics and Public Affairs
In PFS Supports Two Student and Faculty Events that Advance Free Expression, Executive Director Angela Smith highlights PFS support for two important on-campus events that happened in February, one organized by students, the other by faculty.
“Free speech and open inquiry are not abstract ideals – they are the lifeblood of a healthy university community. At Princetonians for Free Speech (PFS), we strive to advance those principles through practical, tangible support for students and faculty who put them into action. As such, we are pleased to tell you about two recent events at Princeton, supported by PFS, that reflect this mission in powerful ways.”
Read more about these events, why PFS supports them, and why you should support PFS.
And read coverage of these two events in the Student Corner below, written by our writing fellows Annabel Green ‘26 and Joseph Gonzalez ‘28.
February 2, 2026
Dear PFS Subscribers and Friends,
2026 has started with a bang. “Viewpoint diversity” is in the news. What is its role in protecting the knowledge-generating and truth-seeking mission of America’s universities? Please see our Special Feature, an original article by PFS’s Edward Yingling and Leslie Spencer, The Next Campus Battle after Free Speech: Viewpoint Diversity at America’s Elite Universities.
Also see an important new book Viewpoint Diversity: What It Is, Why We Need It, and How to Get It, forthcoming next month from Heresy Press. It is a collection of essays by some of the country’s leading heterodox thinkers who confront the rise of orthodoxy on both the left and the right.
And our Quote of the Month is from a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, Is a Four-Year Degree Worth It? by the President of Dartmouth Sian Leah Beilock, who makes an urgent call for university leaders to take action now to “reform ourselves.”
Happy New Year from PFS!
Dear PFS Subscribers and Friends,
We’d like to take this moment at the end of an eventful year at Princeton and throughout the country, to acknowledge two national organizations that pursue higher education reform in important and different ways, both of which are critical to PFS’s success. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), whose impact on free speech and campus discourse policies at over 30 campuses nationwide cannot be underestimated. Collaborating with FIRE on Princeton student surveys and campus reform policies has been invaluable to our growth and impact. The other is Heterodox Academy (HxA), the leading non-partisan membership organization for faculty, staff and students, whose campus community network has now reached over 80 campuses in the US and UK.
