Commentary: Fair Admissions and Fair Assessments

July 03, 2023 1 min read

By Joshua Katz and Solveig Gold
American Enterprise Institute

Excerpt: Last week’s Supreme Court ruling in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is the latest salvo in the war over what one might call the merit of “merit.” With many colleges already ditching quasi-objective metrics like SAT scores on the grounds that such tests are racist, the focus—thanks to one line in the Chief Justice’s opinion—is now squarely on admissions essays, the evaluation of which is evidently subjective. It’s hard not to worry that, despite SFFA’s admirable efforts, the admissions process is about to become even less fair.

How is student performance most fairly evaluated? The question plagues not just admissions officers but educators everywhere.

Leave a comment


Also in National Free Speech News & Commentary

DEI on the Run

May 16, 2024 1 min read

The Editors
National Review

Excerpt: It was a great racket while it lasted, but so-called diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives have spent the last year in retreat — compelling the practitioners of discriminatory “social justice” to conduct a flailing rearguard action in a flight to more defensible terrain.
Read More
Some Cave To Protests: Vanderbilt, Florida, And Chicago Stand Firm

May 15, 2024 1 min read

Michael Poliakoff
Forbes

Excerpt: In 1931, Winston Churchill mocked the prime minister, Ramsay MacDonald, as a “boneless wonder.” The last couple weeks on campus have already given us too many such specimens whose tergiversation and ethical compromise are yet more egregious.

Wise institutions have steadily, especially since October 7, recognized, albeit late, the wisdom of the University of Chicago’s 1967 Kalven Committee: Report on the University’s Role in Political and Social Action. Written amidst the desperate turmoil of the Vietnam war, it counsels “a heavy presumption against the university taking collective action or expressing opinions on the political and social issues of the day, or modifying its corporate activities to foster social or political values, however compelling and appealing they may be.”
Read More
UNC-Chapel Hill Trustees move to divert DEI funds to police and public safety

May 14, 2024 1 min read

Kyle Ingram and Korie Dean
Raleigh News & Observer

Excerpt: The UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees voted to divert millions of dollars spent on diversity, equity and inclusion programs into public safety instead, ahead of an expected policy change statewide to restrict DEI.

At a special meeting Monday morning, the board unanimously moved to reallocate the $2.3 million that the university spends on DEI programs toward police and other public safety measures as part of its annual budget approval process. The university’s operating budget totaled more than $4 billion in the previous fiscal year.
Read More