Commentary: Fair Admissions and Fair Assessments

July 03, 2023 1 min read

By Joshua Katz and Solveig Gold
American Enterprise Institute

Excerpt: Last week’s Supreme Court ruling in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is the latest salvo in the war over what one might call the merit of “merit.” With many colleges already ditching quasi-objective metrics like SAT scores on the grounds that such tests are racist, the focus—thanks to one line in the Chief Justice’s opinion—is now squarely on admissions essays, the evaluation of which is evidently subjective. It’s hard not to worry that, despite SFFA’s admirable efforts, the admissions process is about to become even less fair.

How is student performance most fairly evaluated? The question plagues not just admissions officers but educators everywhere.

Leave a comment


Also in National Free Speech News & Commentary

Commentary: In Defense of the AAUP Statement on Polarizing Times

November 29, 2023 1 min read

John K. Wilson
Academe Blog

Excerpt: It’s always distressing during contentious times when neutral statements for free speech are twisted beyond recognition with false smears of bias and bigotry. In a November 27 essay in The Hill, Northwestern law professor Steven Lubet denounced the American Association of University Professors for a November 15 statement, “Polarizing Times Demand Robust Academic Freedom,” claiming that it has “a distressing anti-Israel bias.” I don’t work for the AAUP, and I don’t speak for the AAUP, but I think Lubet’s charge is completely incorrect and unsupported by any evidence.
Read More
Renowned scholars sign declaration launching global free speech movement

November 29, 2023 1 min read

Matthew Xiao
College Fix

Excerpt: A politically diverse group of 138 public figures recently signed and published the Westminster Declaration, a statement aimed at advancing a global free speech movement.

“We recognize that words can sometimes cause offense, but we reject the idea that hurt feelings and discomfort, even if acute, are grounds for censorship,” it states. “Open discourse is the central pillar of a free society, and is essential for holding governments accountable, empowering vulnerable groups, and reducing the risk of tyranny.”
Read More
Commentary: Hypocritical definitions of ‘academic freedom’ empower extremists

November 27, 2023 1 min read

Steven Lubet
The Hill

Excerpt: The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) quite rightly calls itself the “most prominent guardian of academic freedom” for faculty and students in the U.S. In a recent statement on the Israel-Hamas war, however, titled “Polarizing Times Demand Robust Academic Freedom” the AAUP displayed a distressing anti-Israel bias that sadly undermines its commitment to even-handed protection of free expression.
Read More