Your Cart is Empty
By Marisa Warman Hirschfield ‘27
On April 22nd, Yechiel M. Leiter, Israel’s Ambassador to the U.S., delivered a lecture entitled “The Demonization of Israel and the Rise of Anti-semitism” to approximately seventy-five attendees in McCosh 10. The event was co-sponsored by Chabad, the Center for Jewish Life, B’Artzeinu, and Princetonians for Free Speech. Around twenty P-safe officers and Free Expression Facilitators populated McCosh courtyard in advance of the talk. Every entrance was monitored by security, and fences were set up outside the lecture hall as boundaries for protestors. I attended in my capacity as a Writing Fellow for PFS.
The talk began with an announcement about free expression rules. An administrator shared that disruptions to the lecture might constitute a violation of university policy, subject to disciplinary action and New Jersey trespass law. After a brief statement by Danielle Shapiro, the president of Princeton’s pro-Israel group B’Artzeinu, Leiter took the stage, fresh off a trip to the State Department. As he spoke, protesters could be heard from outside, chanting “shame” and “free Palestine” for the duration of the event.
Leiter began with a personal story about his eldest son, an Israeli Defense Force soldier who died in the second week of the war in Gaza. As a bereaved father, Leiter was invited to partake in the March of the Living, an annual trek from Auschwitz to Birkenau in commemoration of the Holocaust. There, Leiter was asked to say Kaddish, the Jewish mourning prayer, for his son. Standing on the grounds of a Holocaust crematorium, he froze and asked himself, “Who am I saying Kaddish for?”
Leiter then shifted his attention to Israel’s enemies in the Middle East, describing the ring of proxies who seek to eliminate the nation. “What we saw on October 7 was supposed to take place all across the country. But Hamas jumped the gun, and didn’t wait for the ring of fire to attack all at once.”
He spoke at length about Israel’s efforts to curb noncombatant deaths in Gaza. “Instead of taking you on Yom Hashoah to Yad Vashem, I would take you to the Southern Command. I’d show you the lengths that we take in order to avoid civilian casualty.” He also acknowledged that 50,000 dead in Gaza is “a lot of people.” He said, “It’s horrific. I have pain for everyone who suffers, whether they’re on my side or the other side.”
While he recognized the high death toll, he emphasized his disdain for the label genocide, and expressed how this branding is “where anti-semitism begins.”
“We’re not genocidal. We’re not child killers, and it’s quite possible that if we were child killers, my son would be alive today. We could’ve avoided sending our soldiers in by foot and strap bombed population centers [instead].”
He articulated his desire for peace in the region but did not entertain the possibility of a Palestinian state. “You could have peace with the Palestinians tomorrow, but they’re not going to have a sovereign state smack in the middle of our country. Sorry, it’s just not going to happen. We’ve lived with that kind of terrorism for too long, and every time we withdraw, every time we give up territory in this tiny country that we have, we’ve paid for it in blood. And October 7th was the breaking point.”
The lecture was followed by a Q&A portion and a brief heated exchange. One attendee told the ambassador that he “plays a really good character.” The attendee proceeded to cite reports of the Israeli military using carbon monoxide to gas the Palestinian resistance and Jewish captives. Leiter vehemently denied these claims, calling them blatant lies, and insisted that gassing is not a practice of the Israeli military. He then passionately underscored the violence of the October 7th attacks. Raising his voice, he said, “Our civilians were slaughtered. Women were beheaded as they were raped, and the most offensive thing is, nobody gave a damn.”
A few questions followed that exchange, and when the event concluded, approximately fifty protestors were chanting outside McCosh, holding signs.
Marisa Warman Hirschfeld ’27 studies History and Creative Writing and is a Princetonians for Free Speech Writing Fellow.
Princetonians for Free Speech
Since the beginning of the year, Princetonians for Free Speech has been warning that Princeton and other universities were likely to be hit with a big increase in the current 1.4 % tax on endowment income. Now it is happening.
In the early hours of yesterday morning, the House Ways & Means Committee voted to report out its part of the Reconciliation bill – a.k.a. the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” This massive bill contains numerous tax provisions, including a large increase in the tax rate, now 1.4%, on endowment income. The bill creates a tiered tax rate based on an institution’s “student-adjusted” endowment. There are four rates: 1.4%, 7%, 14%, and 21%. The 21% rate applies to schools with an endowment of at least $2 million per student. It is the same as the corporate tax rate. Princeton qualifies for the 21%. According to one article, others qualifying for the highest rate are Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and MIT. Here is a list of the largest endowments. Princeton is listed at $34 billion. Note that Texas, which has a large endowment, is not covered by the endowment tax because it is a public university.
Christopher Bao and Annie Rupertus
Daily Princetonian
Excerpt: Princeton asked all departments and University units to prepare “separate plans for 5 percent and 10 percent permanent budget cuts to be phased in over the next three years, with some actions to start later this summer” in an email sent to faculty and staff on Monday afternoon — the University’s most dramatic budgetary guidance yet following a tumultuous semester for higher education.
The email, sent by Provost Jennifer Rexford and Executive Vice President Katie Callow-Wright, explicitly acknowledged the potential for layoffs to be part of budget reductions. “Cuts of this magnitude to our budget cannot be achieved without changes to some operations and the associated elimination of some staff positions,” they wrote.
David Montgomery ‘83
Princeton Alumni Weekly
Excerpt: For the first time in memory, Princeton is inviting alumni, faculty, students, and allies to lend their voices to a broad campaign of political advocacy and public affirmation in response to the Trump administration’s unprecedented attacks on research funding and academic freedom in American higher education. “To my knowledge, this is a new kind of initiative for the University,” President Christopher Eisgruber ’83 told PAW in an early May interview about the campaign, which is called “Stand Up for Princeton and Higher Education.”
