Princeton Welcomes the Class of 2027 with Free Speech Events

September 22, 2023 3 min read

Ethan Hicks, ‘26
Princetonians for Free Speech

Excerpt: While Princeton remains ranked significantly below average in the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression 2024 ranking (placing 187th of 248 ranked schools), its commitment to academic freedom of expression in line with the Chicago Principles was renewed during freshman orientation for the Class of 2027. This year’s orientation activities featured a variety of mandatory and optional free speech events educating incoming students on their free speech rights.

On August 29, President Eisgruber held a discussion with current executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, Anthony Romero, in front of the entire incoming freshman class in McCarter Theater on the importance of embracing freedom of expression in their academic pursuits. The event was a required Core Event for all 1,366 members of the Class of 2027.

The event focused on the importance of free speech, particularly as it pertains to dissent. When Eisgruber asked Romero why he believes free speech is important, Romero replied, “I think it’s foundational to personal fulfillment, in terms of figuring out what you think, what you believe in, who you are, who you associate with. I think it’s foundational to a society that allows individuals to be their very best as they define it. I think it’s essential to the workings of democracy.”

While the University heralded the event as a great success on its website, Eisgruber’s conversation with Romero was not universally well received. In his National Review article titled “The ACLU’s Free-Speech Sophistry Comes to Princeton,” Princeton senior Matthew Wilson, who is the Communications and Marketing Fellow for Princetonians for Free Speech, highlighted Romero’s uniformly pro-progressive rhetoric, much of which was omitted from the University’s official press release for the event.

There was also a smaller event featuring former President of the ACLU Dr. Nadine Strossen as part of the Community Action small group orientation programming. As part of their orientation activities, incoming freshmen participate in a multi-day small group experience. Dr. Strossen spoke to a group of approximately 100 such freshman students placed into the Community Action Program, which focuses on engaging students in complex societal issues. The event was organized by community action fellow Enzo Kho ’26 for the Community Action Youth Development Cohort.

On August 31, Dr. Strossen spoke with students on the importance of free speech and seeking to understand those that hold views different from one’s own in a small log cabin at the Princeton-Blairstown Center. She opened the session with her thoughts on free speech at academic institutions. “Free speech is the essential prerequisite for pursuing and exercising all other rights and all other causes,” she said

Although Dr. Strossen said she is liberal in her political beliefs, she stressed that it does not stop her from befriending those who think differently. For instance, she spoke of her relationship with the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Strossen said that “we strongly agreed on many free speech issues, while strongly disagreeing on other constitutional law issues, such as abortion. And we shared many common interests, including opera and Shakespeare.” Strossen further shared that they did not let their differences prevent them from learning from each other and developing a strong friendship.

Despite her commitment to hearing out those with ideological differences, she stood firm on the importance of never compromising on one’s values. “One can – and should – respect the equal and inherent dignity of every human being, regardless of any individual differences among us,” Strossen told these members of the Class of 2027. “My experience indicates that, the more openly and undefensively we explore and discuss values, the more the issues become a matter of not ‘opposites,’ but rather degrees.”

The Eisgruber-Romero event marks the second year in a row in which the University made a sustained commitment to explaining free speech at Princeton to incoming freshmen. Last year, Myles McKnight, current Programs Associate at Princetonians for Free Speech, gave a speech to the Class of 2026 on why students should care about free speech. McKnight encouraged freshmen to “challenge the institution when it falters or disrespects those ideals, as it often does.”

In addition to the University’s official freshmen orientation events, the James Madison Program held an open house on Free Speech on September 12. The event featured a discussion between Keith Whittington, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics, and Myles McKnight. Whittington opened the event by discussing the protections that the Chicago Principles provide both students and faculty to speak freely and invite speakers with whom the University may disagree. McKnight stressed how students must listen to those with whom they may vehemently disagree if they are to seek the truth.

Professor Robert P. George, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence and Director of the James Madison Program, concluded the event with a discussion of the Madison Program’s Undergraduate Fellows Forum.

Ethan Hicks, a PFS Writing Fellow, is a sophomore from Perry, Ohio studying economics.

Leave a comment

Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

Guest Essay in PAW: We’re Calling on Princeton to Do More to Fight Antisemitism on Campus

November 30, 2023 1 min read

Jacob Katz '23, Leon Skornicki '06
Princeton Alumni Weekly

Excerpt: As PAW has compellingly demonstrated in recent articles, Hamas’ barbarous attacks on Israeli citizens hit close to home for many Princetonians. But the attacks’ aftermath has reached us all. Skyrocketing antisemitism has reverberated around the globe, and sure enough, it made its way through Fitz Randolph Gate. Following two student-led pro-Intifada rallies, concerned students reached out to alumni about unchecked antisemitism on campus.

As alumni, we want current students to guide campus discourse. We had our turn, and now it is theirs. But as Princeton occupies a prominent place in both our personal identities and our national conversation, we have reason to make our voices heard when something is awry. And when exasperated students turn to us and other alumni for help, something is awry.
Read More
Can the Coming Crisis Revitalize our Republic? Thoughts on “Struggles of an Optimist,” a talk by Mitch Daniels ‘71

November 27, 2023 3 min read

By Khoa Sands ‘26

The idea of decline has always held a certain allure to historians and politicians alike. The high prophet of this declinism was Oswald Spengler, whose 1918 book The Decline of the West has become a motivating treatise for the American New Right. For these modern-day doomsayers, the United States is predestined to ruin, beset by internal crises of spiritedness and domestic politics as well as external threats of rising challengers to the US-led world order. These concerns are not unfounded – a revanchist China will be the largest geopolitical crisis of the twenty-first century and any casual observer of American politics can attest to the sorry state of domestic politics in America today.

Read More
On institutional neutrality and double-standards

November 21, 2023 1 min read

Matthew Wilson, Daily Princetonian

 Excerpt: As I write this essay, the despicable poison of Jew-hatred has taken a firm hold at so many college campuses, Princeton included. Here at Princeton, activists proudly chant “Intifada” and demand the complete eradication of the world’s only Jewish state; elsewhere, from CornellHarvard, and the University of Pennsylvania to Ohio State and Cooper Union, frightening (and sometimes violent and illegal) exhibitions of anti-Jewish attitudes abound.

For the most part, university responses to these shameful displays have been tepid and restrained. these same universities, despite being so reticent to speak out now, have a prolonged public history of weighing in on a wide array of hotly contested and politically controversial topics. At Princeton, for instance, recent years have seen official statements issued deploring Supreme Court rulings on abortion and affirmative actioncondemning a jury verdict, and attacking a professor for his political views. On Hamas’s terrorist attacks? No official statements.

Read More