Commentary: Make Princeton a sanctuary for federal researchers

December 11, 2024 1 min read

1 Comment

Alex Norbrook
Daily Princetonian

Excerpt: A broad swath of researchers employed by the federal government are set to be forced out of their jobs — and Princeton can do something about it.

Across the board, President-elect Donald Trump plans to bring a hatchet to the federal civil service. He has spoken about slashing positions from key government departments, scattering federal agency headquarters across the country to trigger resignations, and potentially driving more federal employees out by weaponizing government institutions for his benefit. As these actors begin to dismantle public research infrastructure, Princeton must position itself as a sanctuary institution for displaced researchers.

Click here for link to full article

1 Response

Kenneth McCarthy
Kenneth McCarthy

December 13, 2024

Absolutely not. The federal civil service needs a hatchet taken to it. Also, this particular statement, while protected free speech, is patently partisan bullshit. “Potentially driving more federal employees out by weaponizing government institutions for his benefit”

Let’s focus our efforts on protecting free speech and not on not-so-subtly advancing ideological agendas.

Leave a comment


Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

Harvard Professor Delivers Constitution Day Lecture on Affirmative Action

September 30, 2025 3 min read

By Marisa Hirschfield ‘27

On September 17th, Harvard Law School professor Jeannie Suk Gersen delivered the annual Constitution Day Lecture in McCosh 50. The lecture, co-hosted by the James Madison Program and the Program in Law and Normative Thinking, was entitled “Our Civil Rights Revolution.” Professor Gersen discussed the history of affirmative action and the evolving meaning of civil rights. 

Read More
Op Ed: Princetonians for Free Speech defends free speech for all

September 23, 2025 1 min read

Angela Smith and Leslie Spencer
Daily Princetonian

Excerpt: In a recent Opinion piece, Siyeon Lee and Charlie Yale critiqued a letter from Princetonians for Free Speech (PFS) to entering first-year students that appeared recently in The Princeton Tory, the University’s leading conservative political magazine. In their piece, Lee and Yale questioned why we chose to publish in “a journal that only appeals to a select few on this campus,” and accused us of holding “selective views of free speech.”  

To be clear: there is no such thing as free speech for some but not for others. Other than speech that is unprotected by First Amendment law, PFS is committed to defending the widest possible freedom of speech and open discourse for everyone, no matter how unpopular or offensive the point of view.

Read More
When Academics want to Bring Down the Academy — a Princeton Example

September 22, 2025 6 min read

By Tal Fortgang ‘17

With students returning to campus for the start of the new academic year, and demonstrations from radical groups sure to crop up on quads once again, one question universities face is how to balance robust academic freedom with universities’ competing interests. Schools cannot live on academic freedom alone; the functioning of a university requires standards, rules, and regulations to allow students and faculty to flourish. Yet university leadership, especially at elite schools where abstract thinking is prized and questions are regularly left unanswered as matters of mere intellectual exercise, has not even begun to articulate a principled way of weighing these matters. They can begin to do so by considering an unlikely – and unwitting – source of wisdom: Princeton professor Lorgia García Peña’s recent address to the Socialism 2025 conference, on using one’s academic perch to dismantle the academy. 

Read More