PFS Campus Update: Annual Giving Rate Plummets; Will Princeton Duck the Endowment Tax?; Free Speech at Orientation

September 15, 2025 4 min read

4 Comments

Princetonians for Free Speech (PFS) now has over 16,000 subscribers, a large portion who are undergraduate alumni. The growth in subscribers over the last year has been dramatic, from 1,400 subscribers in December 2024 to over 16,000 today. We have now engaged a powerful and growing segment of the Princeton community.

 Our ambitious goal is to reach 20,000 alumni subscribers. A critical mass of voices on policy matters will help us put pressure on the administration to change policy and improve the free speech climate on campus.

Now, in addition to our regular weekly updates on news at Princeton and nationally, and our PFS Monthly Newsletter, we will be sending to our subscribers occasional Campus Updates on the most important happenings at Princeton. Here is our first Campus Update.

Annual Giving Rate Plummets

An interesting July 10 PAW article on annual giving participation reports a major decline in the participation rate by alumni in annual giving; it has dropped to 43.9%, the lowest in almost 80 years. In the article, Princeton officials try to downplay this drop, but it is a clear signal of unhappiness with the university’s direction. We suspect that some of the decline reflects the fact that recent graduating classes are larger, and younger graduates are less inclined to give. However, anecdotally, many alumni have told us that they have stopped giving to Princeton because of concerns about events on campus and the failure of the leadership to acknowledge that change is needed.

Will Princeton Duck the Endowment Tax?

An interesting article in the August PAW, Will Princeton Avoid Endowment Tax by Increasing Financial Aid?, points out a possible way for Princeton to avoid the endowment tax altogether. The top tax rate of 8% on investment income applies only to Princeton, Yale, Harvard, Stanford, and MIT. For the top rate to apply, a university must have an endowment of over $2 million per student. However, to be subject to the endowment tax at all, another requirement is that a university have over 3,000 tuition paying students. We presume this was to carve out a few small colleges.
  
It seems it would be easy for Princeton to put itself under the threshold of 3,000 tuition-paying students by expanding its financial aid packages, and in fact, the article implies it may already be there. Why wouldn't Princeton do this? It would save more in taxes than the extra cost of additional financial aid. Princeton, because of its smaller size and large endowment, is likely the only university subject to the top rate that can do this. It is doubtful that the authors of the endowment tax meant for Princeton to be excluded, and a Republican Congress might change this provision. However, it may not be easy to find a legislative vehicle to do this, at least until next year.  

Robust Free Speech Discussion at Orientation
   
As many subscribers know, PFS has long pushed for a robust free speech program required for new students during Orientation. In 2020, the year PFS was founded, Orientation’s focus on free speech and academic freedom was grossly inadequate. Since then, Princeton’s efforts to educate in-coming students on free speech improved, although PFS still has had concerns about some of the content of those efforts. We are pleased to report that, according to our student sources, the content of the free speech program this year, led by President Eisgruber and accompanied by Vice President Rochelle Calhoun, was very robust and positive. 

Notable commentary from our student sources – all incoming first-year students – includes:

  • “President Eisgruber urged students to form groups among themselves to talk about different ideas and pushed for student political engagement, even if that means people are arguing in ways that are uncomfortable. He read large chunks of the U Chicago paper and expounded on concrete examples based on the categories of speech included in it, from riots to religious practices to political discussions.”
  • “President Eisgruber maintained that unless someone utters clear hate speech or disrupts university programming, we will have the opportunity to air our opinions on campus. He stressed that we will often disagree with him, classmates, and professors, but that disagreement will provide some of the most fruitful discussions on campus.”
  • “Walking back to my dorm after the presentation, a group of us talked about different things that had happened at Ivy schools, like Columbia, over peaceful dissent and discourse. So, at the very least, it got people thinking a bit and put free speech on our radar.”

While the content was largely positive, several students commented on the poor timing of the free speech address. One student stated, “Having his address be in the evening after three long days days of orientation where people have been partying late every night in the absence of classes may not have been the best way to have students absorb the material.” Another weighed in, stating, “I think the method of communication (two people having an hour-long discussion mildly orbiting President Eisgruber's new book which none of us have read) was a poor choice for antsy, sleep-deprived teenagers.”

The fact remains that, while students are learning more about the importance of free speech and academic freedom, our PFS annual survey of Princeton undergraduates and FIRE’s annual poll show that high numbers of students do not understand what free speech and academic freedom mean in practice. These polls consistently show that Princeton students lack a true understanding of free speech principles.


4 Responses

James Fair
James Fair

September 25, 2025

I have reduced my annual giving to a derisory $1 a year. There is no possibility that I will increase it as long as Eisgruber is president.

Doug Hensler
Doug Hensler

September 19, 2025

Two questions:

Does anyone actually think that annual giving will correct as long as Christopher Eisgruber is president of Princeton?

When is the Board of Trustees going sever the strings hanging off President Eisgruber’s fingers and take action?

Emma Leitch
Emma Leitch

September 19, 2025

Count me as one of the alums with a formerly perfect giving record who stopped participating in Annual Giving this year due to dissatisfaction over Princeton’s refusal to enforce University rules and standards against disruptive anti-Israel protesters.

Blair Perot
Blair Perot

September 19, 2025

“President Eisgruber maintained that unless someone utters clear hate speech"

There is no such thing as “hate speech”. The term “hate” is far too ambiguous. And there is nothing inherently wrong with hating (preferences are mostly a good thing for people to have and also to express). I hate when people are late, for example.

For the last decade the left has effectively and practically defined “clear hate speech” as “any idea the left does not like”.
So in this quote Eisgruber is either being stupid or disingenuous. Eisgruber is a liar. We know this from his acts. He fired a tenured Prof using his gross “hate speech” exception.

Leave a comment


Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

2025 College Rankings

October 23, 2025 1 min read

City Journal

Excerpt: 
Princeton University, like all Ivy League schools, has sunk more deeply into administrative activism over recent years. The school maintains a robust Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) bureaucracy, with more than six DEI employees per 1,000 students. The school also displays several other activist commitments that distract it from its educational mission—most notably, Princeton’s decision to intervene in the Students for Fair Admissions case at the Supreme Court in favor of affirmative action. 

Read More
Eisgruber addresses free speech and censorship during book talk at Princeton Public Library

October 23, 2025 1 min read

Elizabeth Hu 
Daily Princetonian

Excerpt: University President Christopher Eisgruber ’83 addressed conflicts between free speech and censorship on college campuses during a discussion at the Princeton Public Library on Monday. He was joined in conversation by Deborah Pearlstein, Director of Princeton’s Program in Law and Public Policy.

He also addressed the difference between censorship and controversy through a reference to Judge Kyle Duncan, who was invited to speak at Stanford Law School in 2023. Duncan’s talk was interrupted by student protesters throughout and was eventually cut short. “That’s real censorship,” Eisgruber said. “It made it impossible for a speaker that some people on campus wanted to hear to be heard, and that should be recognized.”

Read More
On dining, don’t Harvard our Princeton

October 21, 2025 1 min read 2 Comments

Rodrigo Menezes
Daily Princetonian

Excerpt: Recently, Princeton University announced a policy that would require members of eating clubs and co-ops living in University housing to buy a second meal plan, costing about $900 a year. I, along with all the other members of the Graduate Interclub Council (GICC), believe that this policy would be disastrous for Princeton’s undergraduate experience.

Read More