Your Cart is Empty
Angela Smith
Princetonians for Free Speech
Free speech and open inquiry are not abstract ideals – they are the lifeblood of a healthy university community. At Princetonians for Free Speech (PFS), we strive to advance those principles through practical, tangible support for students and faculty who put them into action.
As such, we are pleased to tell you about two recent events at Princeton, supported by PFS that reflect this mission in powerful ways.
Empowering Student Voices
The student group Princeton Open Campus Coalition (POCC) hosted an event on February 19 featuring RocaNews, a Gen-Z–driven 2020 media startup known for short-form, non-partisan journalism. Their motto “no bias, no fear” seems to have caught on: RocaNews has 1.8 million followers on Instagram and 300k subscribers on YouTube. Roca takes a different approach than the traditional media culture. Instead of outrage and polarization, they strive to inform without inflaming and invite conversation rather than division. They also examine the challenges in running a non-partisan newsroom in an age of censorship, and how to sustain viewpoint diversity in a climate that too often discourages dissent. Read more from one of our PFS student writing fellows who covered the event firsthand.
PFS is proud to fund and amplify student-led events like this. We know that empowering students to organize discussions, question assumptions, and create spaces for varied perspectives is how real change begins. Supporting student organizations that embrace viewpoint diversity ensures that Princeton undergraduates continue to lead by example to bring respectful, open dialogue to campus life.
Amplifying Faculty Voices
PFS is also pleased to support the Princeton Council on Academic Freedom (PCAF), a new group with 70 faculty members. Their February 19 event “Campus Speech and Academic Freedom: A Guide for Difficult Times” convened voices on how to protect academic freedom in today's climate. Read a PFS writing intern perspective from this event. PCAF’s mission aligns with our own: ensuring that Princeton remains fearless, curious, and guided by truth rather than fear of reprisal.
Your support makes free speech possible
These events highlight two pillars of a university committed to fostering a culture of free speech and viewpoint diversity: students who engage courageously and faculty who defend freedom of thought. PFS is honored to support both efforts, reinforcing Princeton’s proud tradition as a place where open discourse is not merely tolerated, but celebrated.
When you donate to PFS, you make events like these possible. Your support equips both students and faculty to model the open, honest exchange of ideas that a great university depends on.
In addition to supporting campus events, your contributions also fund our PFS Writing Fellows (student interns), two of whom personally attended and reported on these programs. Every gift helps strengthen the culture of free expression that Princeton desperately needs, and inspires the next generation to carry those values forward. We appreciate your donation consideration.
Angela Smith is the Executive Director of Princetonians for Free Speech.
Comments will be approved before showing up.
Free speech is usually described as a right one either has or does not have, relative to the laws of one’s residence. But a right, like a muscle, is only as strong as its use. When my family flew to the United States in 2018, I naively thought that I had escaped the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) systematic suppression of free speech. I believed that I would access Google, YouTube, and Winnie the Pooh without any need for a VPN to circumvent the “Great Firewall of China,” a term used to describe the CCP’s firm control on online content. But I was clueless: I unknowingly carried a part of the repression within me.
In April 1995, University maintenance crews spent two days cleaning “walkways, benches, plazas and walls on campus,” working to remove not dirt or debris, but simple sidewalk chalk. The chalk drawings, according to a report from The Daily Princetonian, consisted of “pro-gay messages” written by hand during Pride Week. After the removal, advocates were rightly in uproar. Following the incident, the University, claiming that the discrepancy had transpired because of “cross-office confusion,” clarified its chalking policy — it was henceforth banned, in all cases.
Three decades on, chalk at Princeton has found itself relegated to dusty trays in classrooms and lecture halls. Hardly anyone — students, activists, artists, campus organizations, candidates, schoolchildren — chalks University grounds anymore. Simply put, the University’s ban has worked. But the question remains: Why is Princeton so afraid of chalk?
There is exactly one kind of institution in the world whose product is “thinking” — the university. This is an existential challenge for every university, Princeton most definitely included, now that nearly all artificial intelligence is purpose-built to offload the hard work of thinking.
Universities need to return to the foundations of learning with trust — and verification — at the heart of their relationship with students. They also need to be far more prescriptive about what learning looks like so that students who arrive with limited capacity for deep reading have the time and space to develop their critical thinking skills.
