Your Cart is Empty
Amelia Freund
My name is Amelia Freund and I am honored to be serving as President of the Princeton Open Campus Coalition (POCC) this year. An Army brat hailing from the DC-Maryland-Virginia area, I am a member of the great class of 2028, the Butler College Class Council, and the Politics Department. In high school I read On Liberty by John Stuart Mill several times over in my philosophy courses, each time I found it engaging and inspirational. I was particularly drawn in by Mill’s defense of free speech. He believed that for an idea to be true, it must be continuously discussed and debated, requiring broad protections for civic discourse. His argument resonated with me a great deal, and has carried me to countless engagements with freedom of speech since then, both in and out of the classroom.
Isaac Barsoum
Daily Princetonian
Excerpt: Leftists at Princeton cheer the assassination of Charlie Kirk — at least, that’s what you would think if you’ve been reading the Opinion section of this newspaper lately. On Sept. 17, Tigers for Israel President Maximillian Meyer ’27 declared that Princeton’s progressives exhibit “a willingness to cheer violence itself.” Princeton Tory Publisher Zach Gardner ’26 didn’t go quite so far, but did say that students “treat bloodshed flippantly,” at least in the context of Kirk’s assassination.
Here’s one problem: large portions of both their arguments rest on evidence drawn from Fizz. For the uninitiated, Fizz is a campus social media app where any Princeton student can say anything at all, true or false, behind the veil of anonymity. It is remarkable that I have to say this: Fizz is not real life.
Cynthia Torres
Daily Princetonian
Excerpt: About three-quarters of the way into an interview with The Daily Princetonian, University President Christopher Eisgruber ’83 made a bold pronouncement: “American universities are the best that they’ve ever been.”
Eisgruber has been in the business of speaking up for universities since the beginning of the Trump administration, which has put unprecedented pressure on Princeton and its peer institutions. His new book, “Terms of Respect,” argues, as the book’s subtitle reads, “how colleges get free speech right.” Despite the perception of intolerance on American college campuses, Eisgruber writes, colleges still host thriving and robust discourse.
Matt Jacobs ‘77
March 27, 2024
Luqmaan -
I am class of 1977 from Princeton; now 68 years old. I read your article from the Prince that appeared on the PFS email that I receive.
You could have written that article in 1973, when I arrived at Princeton from Bethesda, Maryland. This has been the situation for the past 50 years (as I can attest) and most likely for the 50 before that. I came from a great public school – Bethesda-Chevy Chase HS — and ran track, and played football and basketball as well.
I met another Maryland runner early during freshman year. His name was Kerry Lanham. Kerry, an African-American, had gone to a military academy before Princeton. We practiced together and hung out, generally.
I started going to the eating clubs for weekend parties as a freshman, courtesy of a senior who lived on my hallway. I really loved the club I went to most often – Cottage — and wanted to join. I eventually bickered there and received a bid, and had a great two years eating there and having fun on weekends, and I still keep in touch with many of my classmates from Cottage – -50 years later.
Kerry eventually left the track team. Also, during sophomore year, he tended to socialize with more Black kids, and I did not get the impression that he wanted to join a selective club. He also chose to live in what was then known as the “New New Quad,” it’s real name, where many other African-Americans tended to live.
They self-segregated, and I noticed that long before graduating in 1977. I asked myself many of the same questions you have posed in your article – why does that happen? Sure, we tend to like people who “look like us” or who “think like us,” but I noticed that the Princeton “community” grew more strongly among kids from similar backgrounds. Ironically, despite that I went to a (very good) public school, I ended up becoming very close friends with many kids (back then mostly males) who had gone to elite private schools such as Lawrenceville, Deerfield, and The Pingry School. I had public school friends as well, but I noticed that – by the second semester of sophomore year – many in our class seemed to recognize that “we are all here at Princeton, we will all have similar college experiences, and, as a result, we have more in common than we know.”
At least I felt that way.
As for Kerry, I would see him around, and we would say hello. He also moved back to the DC area after graduation, and I saw him at several Princeton alumni event down here. And Kerry’s daughter ended up going to Princeton. I have no idea, of course, about what he shared with her about his Princeton experience, or whether he even enjoyed Princeton – but she went to the school. My two boys, who unfortunately both had social/behavioral issues that impacted their high school experiences, did not even apply. They went to other colleges and did just fine. But I would have loved for them to have gone to Princeton.
I eventually became the President of the Princeton Club of Washington, and then served on the Executive Committee of the Alumni Council. The AC never addressed or considered the issues you have raised during my two two-year terms, but these issues should be addressed. Why do kids who will have a very common four-year college experience tend to self-segregate, which emphasizes their differences rather than their shared experiences? Why do they turn to their own socio-economic and race-based cohorts rather than seeking out different, more diverse connections? Maybe that’s asking too much of kids who are 18-22 years old, and who are all working very hard to do well at the world’s greatest University. But the questions are worth asking, and I am glad to see you did that in your article.
Matt Jacobs ‘77