University Presidential Testimony Fallout

Keith Whittington December 13, 2023 1 min read

Keith Whittington
The Volokh Conspiracy, Reason

Excerpt: The presidents' bad hand in the hearings did not stem from a lack of hate speech regulations. Rather, it was due to the terrible track record that American universities have regarding principled free speech positions on campus. Harvard ranked dead last in the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression's (FIRE) annual campus free speech rankings, and Penn was just one slot above them. Universities all too often have a double standard when it comes to protecting free speech

Click here for link to full article

Leave a comment

Comments will be approved before showing up.


Also in Princeton Free Speech News & Commentary

FIRE Spotlight on Speech Codes 2026: Good News, but Not for Princeton
FIRE Spotlight on Speech Codes 2026: Good News, but Not for Princeton

Leslie Spencer August 20, 2026 2 min read

The good news is that the percentage of colleges and universities earning FIRE's "red light" (bad) rating has reached a low of 13 percent — a 55 percent drop since the "Spotlight" report began in 2006, and a 1.5 percent drop from last year. The bad news is that Princeton is among that 13 percent. Princeton is still found to maintain policies that "clearly and substantially" restrict free expression.

Read More
Free Speech in the Classroom
Free Speech in the Classroom

Robert P. George August 19, 2026 1 min read

With the new academic year approaching, I encourage professors who teach on controversial matters to include on their syllabi a statement like the one I include on mine:

“As set forth in Rights, Rules, Responsibilities section 1.1.3, Princeton University strictly respects the right to free speech of everyone in our community of scholars and learners. That right is sacrosanct in this class and is possessed by faculty and students alike. With the aim of advancing and deepening everyone’s understanding of the issues addressed in the course, students are urged to speak their minds, explore ideas and arguments, play devil’s advocate, and engage in civil but robust discussions. There is no thought or language policing. We expect students to do business in the proper currency of intellectual discourse—a currency consisting of reasons, evidence, and arguments—but no ideas or positions are out of bounds.”

Read More
Princeton Anthropologist's Response to Humanities Report Raises Academic Freedom Concerns
Princeton Anthropologist's Response to Humanities Report Raises Academic Freedom Concerns

Tal Fortgang  August 18, 2026 6 min read

Read More